Improving democratic boundaries through the internet essay

At first, digital media allowed pro- democracy movements to use the internet against authoritarian regimes; however, these regimes eventually worked social media into their own counter-insurgency strategies. Digital media helped to turn individualized, localized, and community-specific dissent into structured movements with a collective consciousness about both shared grievances and opportunities for action. Egyptian Revolution of On January 25 ofmass protests began in Cairo, Egyptprotesting the long reign of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarakthe high unemployment rate, government corruption, povertyand oppression within society. This day revolution did not begin with guns, violence, or protests, but rather with the creation of a single Facebook page which quickly gained the attention of thousands, and soon millions, of Egyptians, spreading into a global phenomenon.

Improving democratic boundaries through the internet essay

Not only was it an illusion, but it was a harmful one, because beneath the guise of objectivity there lay a hidden agenda, namely, an interest in domination. Treating people as objects of study, rather than as subjects, was not politically neutral, because it generated a type of knowledge that just happened to be precisely of the sort that one would need in order to manipulate and control them.

Rather than striving for an elusive value neutrality, it would instead adopt a commitment to improving the human condition, then make these commitments explicit, as part of the inquiry, so that the entire exercise would be methodologically transparent.

What have I learned in the interim? Mainly to be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it!

Two years ago I was asked to serve on a jury for a book prize, to select the best work published by a Canadian university press in the social sciences.

Shortly thereafter, a big box of books arrived on my doorstep, from a wide range of disciplines. In other words, only four of them had as their primary objective the desire to establish and present to the reader facts about the world.

The others, by contrast, had as their primary objective the desire to advance a normative agenda — typically, to combat some form of oppression. Most of these books were also profoundly cringe-inducing. They were, to put it mildly, bad. Forced to read a dozen of them, however, I began to notice certain patterns in the badness.

The biggest problem with the books I read is that they almost invariably failed on the second half of this. It was obvious that the authors — with the exception of a few law professors — had no idea at all how to make a normative argument.

Indeed, they seem incredibly averse even to stating clearly what sort of normative standards they were employing. A genuinely critical theory, Habermas argued, has no need for this subterfuge, it should introduce its normative principles explicitly, and provide a rational defence of them.

There is no group of people out there who actually describe themselves as a neoliberals. Because of this, there are no constraints on what it can refer to, and there is no one to answer any of the criticisms that are made of it.

After all, if they wanted to engage with people outside that chamber, they would have to address one or more of the ideologies that are actually, and self-consciously, held by people outside that chamber. In this respect, people who criticize neoliberalism are the cowardly lions of academia.

Improving democratic boundaries through the internet essay

The fact that there are no self-identified neoliberals in the world does, however, have one desired consequence. As a result, no one ever feels obliged to say what is so bad about it. Beyond that, it can mean pretty much anything.

No one ever explains their reasoning. It seems to be determined just by gut response — whether the person sees means-testing as way of denying benefits to some, or as a way of making the program more progressive and thus reducing inequality.

In any case, the mere fact that applying for the benefit involves filling out a form is likely to lead the critical studies practitioner to denounce it for being committed to the re production of docile bodies, in order to advance the normalizing agenda of the neocolonial state, or something like that.

It was obvious from the discussion that the author also regarded neoconservativism as a terribly bad thing, and in some way different from neoliberalism, but it was absolutely unclear how they were thought to differ.

Reading through these books, I discovered a whole new set of cryptonormative terms that I had perhaps been vaguely aware of, but had not realized how important they were.How Technology Could Contribute to a Sustainable World (Vergragt) Redemption through Crisis (Kartha) The climate challenge and paths to an equitable solution How Technology Could Contribute to a Sustainable World.

Vergragt Great Transition Great Transition. 8 * *. Developmental Autobiography from a Global Perspective - For example, when my sister saw fireworks for the first time as an infant she cried the entire time; however, when I saw fireworks for the first time at the age of 6 months I seemed happy and interested (H.

Patel, personal communication, November 1, ). Improving democratic boundaries through the internet. Introduction The internet has changed the way many things are done. The traditional methods have been scrapped and newer more efficient and effective means are constantly being offered through and on the internet.

Borders and boundaries, commonly defined as the lines dividing distinct political, social, or legal territories, are arguably the most ubiquitous features within the field of political geography. Indeed, borders have become prominent topics of research for a range of scholars from across the social.

Within the boundaries of this specified socialization, is the feeling of efficacy, or how important one feels their opinion effects government. Every person undergoes a different process of political socialization and therefore renders a different level of efficacy/5(5).

This paper identifies the most important innovations in software, removing hardware advances and products that didn't embody significant new software innovations. Its results may surprise you.

Improving democratic boundaries through the internet essay
Democratic Party (United States) - Wikipedia