Divorce Residency Requirements in North and South Carolina A court must have jurisdiction over your case in order to hear your divorce case. Jurisdiction in divorce cases is usually established based on state residency requirements. North Carolina Divorce Residency Requirements North Carolina law requires one of the spouses to have been a North Carolina resident for at least six months prior to the filing of the divorce complaint.
Patricia sues Daniel in federal district court over money that she says he owes her. She wins her case.
Daniel appeals the decision in the federal appellate court, which overturns the lower court's decision on a technical error. Patricia appeals to the U.
Supreme Court, and the court refuses to hear the case. Patricia attempts to sue Daniel a second time in the state court system over the same issue of the money she says he owes her. Does the fact that Patricia took her case to the highest federal court and lost prevent her from starting the same case in a state court?
Civil Procedure questions quite naturally focus on whether a plaintiff or defendant has correctly followed the rules in bringing a case to court.
Civil Procedure generally does not focus on the substance of the dispute - i. The principle of res judicata states that once a final judgment on the merits has been made on a particular case, the plaintiff is barred from bringing that same case against the same defendant in the same or different court.
Since Patricia appealed the case to the highest court, a final judgment is considered to have been made on the matter. She has exhausted all of the potential appeals by going to the highest court which has ruled on her case. If she attempts to bring the same cause of action i.
Criminal Law Hypothetical Facts: Just as the sun is setting one night, Carl sees that the door to Vince's house is ajar.
Carl knows that Vince has a home office in which there is expensive computer equipment. Is opening an unlocked door to a building at twilight to commit a theft sufficient to constitute a charge of burglary?
The common law requirements for a burglary are that there be: Element 1 Although the door was ajar and unlocked, Carl's merely opening the door was sufficient minimal force to constitute a breaking since the nearly shut door was meant to deter unwanted entry.
No actual breaking of the door or lock is necessary. Elements 2, 3 and 4 Carl clearly entered the house, which is not his own. The house is considered a dwelling since Vince regularly uses the house for sleeping purposes.
Element 5 Whether it would be considered night at twilight is determined by whether Vince's face could be discerned in natural light at that hour. Notice how methodically each element is proven using the facts provided.
Even though something like entering seems self-evident, the fact that the defendant actually crossed the threshold has to be stated in order for the legal analysis to be complete. Vince is probably subject to a charge of burglary even though it was not technically nighttime and the door was unlocked.
Peter and Doug are neighbors who hate one another. One day, Doug is nailing some boards together on the common sidewalk that he shares with Peter.
In a classic slapstick comedy move, Doug picks up a board just as Peter is passing behind him and swings around so that the back end hits Peter in the head.
The smack in the head causes substantial injury to Peter. Is existing malice between two people enough to show the intent necessary for liability for battery? The three elements of battery are: Element 1 The hitting of Peter in the head with a board is considered harmful since it caused substantial injury.
Element 2 Doug directly caused the injury since he was physically holding the board as it swung into Peter. Element 3 The question of whether Doug intended to hit Peter is a matter of fact that must be decided by a jury. The fact that Doug hated Peter may weigh in the matter but is not dispositive.
Doug must have known that Peter was behind him and intentionally swung the board so as to purposefully harm Peter. Without further evidence, the facts do not appear to indicate the intent necessary for Peter to sue Doug for the tort of battery.The study included interviews with people going through divorce, focus groups with lawyers, observation of the court scrutiny process and analysis of divorce court files, coupled with a national opinion poll and comparative analysis of divorce law in other countries.
Jun 11, · Opinion analysis: Court rejects constitutional challenge to state law on insurance policies after divorce Posted Mon, June 11th, pm by Amy Howe The man’s children had argued that they should get the money because a state law passed in specifies that when one spouse designates the other as his life-insurance beneficiary, that.
The Quest for Intimacy and Passion: Challenges for the ACD As you may know, the divorce rate continues to hover around fifty percent, where it has been now for some time.
If half of marriages end in divorce today, it is likely that many of you—like me—are ACD's—Adult Children of Divorce. The highest divorce rate was for first-line enlisted military supervisors, its analysis of Census Bureau’s Public Use Microdata Sample, or PUMS, data found. They had a divorce rate of 30%.
Divorce brings about a lot of legal issues, which include child custody, visitation, holiday issues, and child support. There are a few different types of custody arrangements. There is joint custody with visitation, which means that you share custody with the other parent.
Based in Ottawa, Clarity is a “one-stop shop” for people dealing with the challenges of separation or divorce—no matter what stage you are at in the process.
Going through a separation or divorce can be confusing, complicated, incredibly emotional, and even frightening.